![]() ![]() 40:55D-62.1, which requires similar notice when there is a proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance resulting in a classification or boundary change. 4:55D-63 rather than the parallel statute, N.J.S.A. Plaintiffs first assert that the trial court erred in holding that they were not entitled to statutory notice of the proposed zoning change of the Development Parcel pursuant to N.J.S.A.She also rejected additional arguments regarding notice of other zoning changes located throughout the municipality as well as an allegation of spot zoning. Judge Feinberg, in the Law Division, concluded that the exemption provision of the statute applied, and no personal notice was required. ![]() 40:55D-89, obligates a municipality to provide personal notice to those landowners who are located within two hundred feet of the boundaries of such change. 40:55D-89)." This appeal requires us to determine whether proposed zoning changes creating a higher density residential zone located adjacent to a landowner's property and recommended pursuant to the statutorily mandated six-year review of a municipal master plan, N.J.S.A. ![]() The same amendments, however, exempt from its notice provisions "classification or boundary changes recommended in a periodic general reexamination of the master plan by the planning board pursuant to Section 76 of P.L. 40:55D-62.1 and -63, provide for notice of zoning classification and boundary changes to those property owners located within two hundred feet of the boundaries of the district subject to the changes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |